mairandeddy, on 14 March 2013 - 01:12 PM, said:
^ so what you're saying is that the smaller the original in relation to the 'print', the more 'pixellated' the image is....

When you design something in CAD, you design in in a 3D space with exact measurements. I designed my wheel to be 25mm in diameter so that it will print out 25mm in diameter. So i guess the relation is 1:1. I can create a lot of detail in CAD by zooming in, but it would be pointless because the limitation isn't CAD, it's the printer.
The makerbot replicator 2 has a resolution of up to 100 microns (says the website). So i thought it could handle my first design, but as you can see i was wrong. You don't only have to take into account resolution, but also the way the printer works and how it builds a part. There's a chance it could be done better, but i'm not sure. I am brand new to this and so is my friend who printed it out for me.
I don't know if i'm explaining it any better....to me it seems like a pretty simple concept. If the part i wanted to print was bigger, it would have smoother transitions, but since it was small, the transitions are rougher.
I guess another way to explain it is it's like a circle on a computer. If you have a set resolution on a computer monitor and draw a tiny circle, the circle could potentially be composed of 4 pixels in a diamond shape. But as you make a larger circle (on the same computer), the circumference of the circle is composed of more points so the circle looks smoother and more round. Same concept with the 3D printer. If i had a printer that printed to the 0.000000000000000000001 millimeter, then i'm sure it would look exactly like the CAD drawing, but the limitation is the printer.
Edited by SleepyS2k, 14 March 2013 - 04:47 PM.