DiecastXchange Forum banner
1 - 18 of 808 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts
I'm quite interested in the M-210 Ferrari 275GTB/C in plain red without racing decals. However on their website they said that it would feature "cast-aluminum wheels and Pirelli tyres instead of Borrani wire wheels" because the plain version never saw "the rigor of wheel-to-wheel competition".

Anyone have more insight into this as it seems quite a major turnoff, if true.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts
Thanks for all the insights!

Personally I would prefer to have a model of the "standard" long-nose 275 GTB/4 without racing affiliations but given this, I may pivot to the limited edition Argento silver or burgundy (Rosso Rubino) racing ones. Unlike Ferraris from other eras I always thought those from the '60s don't have to be red.

Very strange how the 250 GTO in model form is more desirable without racing decals unlike the real car, as that is one of the only Ferraris I might prefer more with racing decal along with the 250 LM. Perhaps something to do with Ralph Lauren's own 250 GTO not having any racing decal?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts
Yeah I'd agree with you Mike about Kyosho's 250 GTO, which I'm still in the market for. A Kyosho "hi-end" version seems to go for ~$250 these days, which already isn't so cheap.

I thought we were talking about the GTO. When they were new they were less than $400, or right around there.

The SWB and California's are about double what they used to be. I got my SWB for $250. The cheapest similar model is $700. And the California is even more expensive. All of it is crazy. When a model sells for several hundred dollars more than new, I think they are no longer "reasonable". Get them when they new or it's not worth it to me.
Yeah the 250 California is definitely above my budget, with the black and blue limited editions the most desired with a ~$900 asking.

I found a 250 SWB Le Mans #14 priced at ~$490, don't know if I should take the plunge. What do you guys think of this price? Huge regrets for not buying new when they were $250, but I guess that price is not so relevant anymore.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts
I also didn't pre-order the CMC 275 GTB/C based on whether it would appreciate substantially in the future, but I chose chassis 09051 because I like the wire wheels and I think Argento Silver best captures the shape of these 1960s Ferraris.

Having looked at many photos of the 275 GTB/4, which only existed in long-nose form, I just don't think the BBR version properly replicated the shape of the front headlights. But I'm not sure to what extent this affected BBR's sales.

 

· Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts
BTW, I'm puzzled why this 275 GTB #26 is so popular. Limited edition 1800 pieces (so more than the 250 GTO #19) and it seems they are already sold out before release. Is it because people see this as the next 250 GTO #19? But result wise it's no where near the Le Mans class winner 250 GTO #19. In fact, it didn't even finish the race.

I do agree that among the announced 275 racers, this livery is the most beautiful one, as this is the only red livery racer.
I think its just because most people only collect Ferrari models in red, and given its limited edition. I went with the silver, but I noticed the burgundy one is also sold out on the CMC website.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts
That is good to know, hopefully it won't be as weird as the GTO turned out.
Same, hopefully the 275 GTB/C will be an accurate model unlike the 250 GTO and DB4 GT Zagato. I just checked on CMC's website and apparently all four limited edition colours are sold out... and we are still at least half a year away from the first batch of completed models. I hope they will take note of the popularity of these 1960s Ferraris and make more, like the 330 P4, 250 LM, 275 GTB/4 NART and 250 GT Berlinetta Lusso. It seems like they have been focusing a lot on 1930s Mercedes and Alfa Romeos.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts
So we can argue the street version CMC 250 GTO is based on 3809GT, so its shape can be considered as accurate. But how about the CMC race versions? In particular #19 would have a wrong shape because the 1:18 model is also based on 3809GT, right?
We can argue that the ''street version'' CMC 250 GTO reflects the accurate shape of 3809GT during the period between 1965 and 2016 (?).

Here is the history of the car (not updated with the recent restoration):
http://www.barchetta...09GT.250GTO.htm
see Oct. 1965 .. - restored with partly new bodywork made at Les Monks, GB - wrong nose

The CMC is still an excellent model don't get me wrong. But the ultimate 250 GTO in 1:18 has yet to be made.
[/quote]

That makes a lot of sense. I was looking at some of the old photos of this particular chassis number and instantly recognized the slightly-flattish shape of the hood as that of the CMC model. It seems like a proper rebuild later rectified this issue, prior to being sold by Tom Hartley Jr in 2019.

https://www.tomhartleyjnr.com/tomtalks/ferrari-250-gto/
 

· Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts
Yes, the rivets on the CMC 312P and the Lancia D50 look so wrong, it's a shame... Accurate scale rivets don't seem to be hard to accomplish:

The interior could be improved, sure, but I bet CMC wouldn't bother with details like the dangling keychain above the shifter, that makes the GMP quite special:
These pics make me want one... as they look somewhat worth the CMC money that they are trading at today.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts
Indeed more colors than every single CMC Ferrari model before.
And I think it makes very good sense from business point of view. Better to release more 'limited' edition variants than only in red and yellow like the 250 SWB.
Collectors more preferably to buy a model in different colors than 3x the same color.
Indeed it is regrettable that CMC didn't release more colours over a longer period of time for popular models like the 250 SWB, which only had 4 variants. Like you said, they could have further monetized collectors who may otherwise have bought more than one of each, given the minimal incremental R&D that would have entailed.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts
1 - 18 of 808 Posts
Top