Not that there's anything wrong with that. :lolpeter said:
I always thought that a hairdresser's car was a car that looks nice but doesn't cut the mustard when it comes to handling and performance. :confusedpeter said:
Relative to the competition, yes it does lack torque but remember that it has the smallest naturally-aspirated engine of the lot and its specific torque output of 75lb/ft per litre is extremely good for an engine that doesn't use forced induction - the 350Z's engine only has only got 3lb/ft of torque per litre more than the S2000's own despite being 1.5 litres larger.Venom said:S2000: Lacks Torque and has a stiff suspension
Not so, the MX5 is the archetypal hairdressers car and that is one of the best drivers cars you can buy at any price.I always thought that a hairdresser's car was a car that looks nice but doesn't cut the mustard when it comes to handling and performance
If you have opinions like these, keep them to yourself........don't pollute this place with your disrespectful, rude and downright IGNORANT comments anymore. I for one have had enough :ranting :ranting :ranting...... prize tit when driving one because deep down everyone knows you are a vain tart who would buy dogsh*t if you thought it was cool enough.