This is a head to head review for the Autoart Porsche Carrera GT in silver, the Minichamps Porsche Carrera GT in red, and Maisto Carrera GT in black.
Some points that don't fit in the review categories will be discussed. Both models come in a Styrofoam box, with an outer cardboard box. The Autoart has various pics of the model on the box. The Minichamps has model pics and a little info about the car. The top of the AUTOart Styrofoam box is covered with a cardboard piece, which is removable to reveal the roof pieces and leather straps. The Minichamps has the roof pieces hidden in the trunk of the model. The AUTOart is secured to the box with just pegs (i.e. no screws, like the AUTOart Veyrons/Chirons). I personally love this, as it secures the model without having those annoying screws. The Minichamps model has no screws, just form fitted inside the Styrofoam. The AUTOart model is VERY light, it feels like a 1/18 scale plastic kit, except just a tad heavier. This is due to the plastic bumpers, sides, and undercarriage. The Minichamps, on the other hand, is much heavier and feels much better built. The bumpers and sides are all metal. I've also included the Maisto CGT in this head to head comparison, but I personally don't have the model, that's why some points may seem "unsure" on my part. I based my review of it on Jeff's (Max Power) pics. And while I'm at it, I want to thank Jeff for taking these AMAZING pics for us! You're the best! I also want to thank J-san for pointing out the Maisto rim error in my review (prototype rims instead of prod. rims). Thank you both! :cheers
AUTOart: Brakes - accuracy=6 detail=7
Minichamps: Brakes - accuracy=6 detail=8
Maisto: Brakes - accuracy=7 detail=6
Both higher end models' discs move with the tires, and the callipers are static. However, both brakes on the models are done wrong.
The AUTOart is wrong on many fronts. Firstly, it should be cross drilled, and secondly, it shouldn't be as rough as it is on the model's discs. Note that the black AUTOart brake discs are cross drilled though. At least AUTOart got the colour right, as the discs should be carbon. AUTOart also got the inner ring inside the brake disc correct, with the bolts molded as well. On the rear brakes, there is an extra calliper as well.
The Minichamps is nowhere near perfecet either. It is wrong on the colour, as it should be carbon instead of silver coloured. Also, the discs don't have the inner ring of the brake disc, and the discs are too "in" the wheel (i.e. distance between rim and brake disc is way too much). At least there are indentations for the cross drilled holes, but they're not really drilled through, but just dimples in the discs. Looking at the details of the callipers, the Minichamps edges out on AUTOart in this case, with finer details. The rear brakes also has an extra calliper, just like the AUTOart.
The Maisto brakes are surprisingly well done. They're in the correct colour, and are cross drilled (looks like real holes and not dimples like the Minichamps). Note that the cross drilled holes are not frequent enough (i.e. too few "sets" of holes). The inner ring of the discs is also replicated, with the nuts molded too, but it is in the same colour of the discs when it should be silver. The discs are also grooved, which is inaccurate. The calliper isn't as detailed as the other two brands, and the rear secondary calliper shouldn't be yellow. The discs do not move with the wheels though.
I gave a slightly higher score for the Minichamps, due to the cross drilled dimples and the better calliper details, despite the lack of the inner ring. Overall, I am disappointed with both higher end manufacturers.The Maisto is surprisingly, more accurate overall than the other two brands, kudos, Maisto!
AUTOart: Engine - accuracy=7 detail=7
Minichamps: Engine - accuracy=8 detail=8
Maisto: Engine - accuracy=7 detail=6
Both models are wrong in the engine too! On the AUTOart, the "Porsche" labelled piece is too big in relation to the two silver things on the side, and the pipes leading out are too big as well. The carbon fibre at least is the right colour, but the weird "M" looking CF piece near the springs is too big. There doesn't seem to be much detail under that "M" CF piece either. The hood raises up on struts, but don't stay up by itself, as noted by my trusty finger in the pic above. Otherwise, the rest of the AUTOart engine is pretty good, with correct detail painting around the engine (e.g. red struts on the springs).
The Minichamps engine is better done than the AUTOart, but not without its faults. The "M" CF piece near the springs is still too big, and it's YELLOW! This is just plain wrong and weird, why did Minichamps put yellow lined CF on the model? The "Porsche" labelled piece is better proportioned here, and the pipes leading out of there is better painted (with the silver, black, silver bands, instead of just silver like on the AUTOart). The springs are better done, and there is more detail underneath that "M" CF piece than the AUTOart. Hood stays up by itself, on struts as well. Hood opens a tad higher than the AUTOart.
The Maisto engine again, surprised me with its quality/details. Firstly, the "M" CF piece is the best proportioned out of the three brands, and the kidney things beside the Porsche pieces are correctly sized. However, these kidneys are wrongly shaped though. The pipes leading out of the kidneys are molded only, which detracts from the look of the engine. However, looking underneath the "M" CF piece, what really surprised me was the amount of detail and detail painting I saw! Look at the different coloured bolts on that black CF (?) piece beside the silver plates! The inclusion of real springs for the suspension is nice as well, even though the springs are too large and each "curl" is too far apart.
Decent effort from both higher end brands, but it's obvious the Minichamps is better here. Maisto surprises once again with a decent engine which has more detail underneath the "M" CF piece than the other two brands.
*CONTINUED ON NEXT POST*
Some points that don't fit in the review categories will be discussed. Both models come in a Styrofoam box, with an outer cardboard box. The Autoart has various pics of the model on the box. The Minichamps has model pics and a little info about the car. The top of the AUTOart Styrofoam box is covered with a cardboard piece, which is removable to reveal the roof pieces and leather straps. The Minichamps has the roof pieces hidden in the trunk of the model. The AUTOart is secured to the box with just pegs (i.e. no screws, like the AUTOart Veyrons/Chirons). I personally love this, as it secures the model without having those annoying screws. The Minichamps model has no screws, just form fitted inside the Styrofoam. The AUTOart model is VERY light, it feels like a 1/18 scale plastic kit, except just a tad heavier. This is due to the plastic bumpers, sides, and undercarriage. The Minichamps, on the other hand, is much heavier and feels much better built. The bumpers and sides are all metal. I've also included the Maisto CGT in this head to head comparison, but I personally don't have the model, that's why some points may seem "unsure" on my part. I based my review of it on Jeff's (Max Power) pics. And while I'm at it, I want to thank Jeff for taking these AMAZING pics for us! You're the best! I also want to thank J-san for pointing out the Maisto rim error in my review (prototype rims instead of prod. rims). Thank you both! :cheers






AUTOart: Brakes - accuracy=6 detail=7
Minichamps: Brakes - accuracy=6 detail=8
Maisto: Brakes - accuracy=7 detail=6
Both higher end models' discs move with the tires, and the callipers are static. However, both brakes on the models are done wrong.
The AUTOart is wrong on many fronts. Firstly, it should be cross drilled, and secondly, it shouldn't be as rough as it is on the model's discs. Note that the black AUTOart brake discs are cross drilled though. At least AUTOart got the colour right, as the discs should be carbon. AUTOart also got the inner ring inside the brake disc correct, with the bolts molded as well. On the rear brakes, there is an extra calliper as well.
The Minichamps is nowhere near perfecet either. It is wrong on the colour, as it should be carbon instead of silver coloured. Also, the discs don't have the inner ring of the brake disc, and the discs are too "in" the wheel (i.e. distance between rim and brake disc is way too much). At least there are indentations for the cross drilled holes, but they're not really drilled through, but just dimples in the discs. Looking at the details of the callipers, the Minichamps edges out on AUTOart in this case, with finer details. The rear brakes also has an extra calliper, just like the AUTOart.
The Maisto brakes are surprisingly well done. They're in the correct colour, and are cross drilled (looks like real holes and not dimples like the Minichamps). Note that the cross drilled holes are not frequent enough (i.e. too few "sets" of holes). The inner ring of the discs is also replicated, with the nuts molded too, but it is in the same colour of the discs when it should be silver. The discs are also grooved, which is inaccurate. The calliper isn't as detailed as the other two brands, and the rear secondary calliper shouldn't be yellow. The discs do not move with the wheels though.
I gave a slightly higher score for the Minichamps, due to the cross drilled dimples and the better calliper details, despite the lack of the inner ring. Overall, I am disappointed with both higher end manufacturers.The Maisto is surprisingly, more accurate overall than the other two brands, kudos, Maisto!



AUTOart: Engine - accuracy=7 detail=7
Minichamps: Engine - accuracy=8 detail=8
Maisto: Engine - accuracy=7 detail=6
Both models are wrong in the engine too! On the AUTOart, the "Porsche" labelled piece is too big in relation to the two silver things on the side, and the pipes leading out are too big as well. The carbon fibre at least is the right colour, but the weird "M" looking CF piece near the springs is too big. There doesn't seem to be much detail under that "M" CF piece either. The hood raises up on struts, but don't stay up by itself, as noted by my trusty finger in the pic above. Otherwise, the rest of the AUTOart engine is pretty good, with correct detail painting around the engine (e.g. red struts on the springs).
The Minichamps engine is better done than the AUTOart, but not without its faults. The "M" CF piece near the springs is still too big, and it's YELLOW! This is just plain wrong and weird, why did Minichamps put yellow lined CF on the model? The "Porsche" labelled piece is better proportioned here, and the pipes leading out of there is better painted (with the silver, black, silver bands, instead of just silver like on the AUTOart). The springs are better done, and there is more detail underneath that "M" CF piece than the AUTOart. Hood stays up by itself, on struts as well. Hood opens a tad higher than the AUTOart.
The Maisto engine again, surprised me with its quality/details. Firstly, the "M" CF piece is the best proportioned out of the three brands, and the kidney things beside the Porsche pieces are correctly sized. However, these kidneys are wrongly shaped though. The pipes leading out of the kidneys are molded only, which detracts from the look of the engine. However, looking underneath the "M" CF piece, what really surprised me was the amount of detail and detail painting I saw! Look at the different coloured bolts on that black CF (?) piece beside the silver plates! The inclusion of real springs for the suspension is nice as well, even though the springs are too large and each "curl" is too far apart.
Decent effort from both higher end brands, but it's obvious the Minichamps is better here. Maisto surprises once again with a decent engine which has more detail underneath the "M" CF piece than the other two brands.
*CONTINUED ON NEXT POST*