Joined
·
3,156 Posts
The headlights still aren't accurate though.It seems that they have corrected position of tail lights on F40.
The headlights still aren't accurate though.It seems that they have corrected position of tail lights on F40.
I doubt they have the money to produce so many new models.So what's the big deal about that? I would think every new model that has yet to be made would probably need new toolings anyway. So if they have to, assuming they agree to make such models, bring it on.
I quoted some images from their catalogue, and added comments to them.Could you please elaborate on it more? I'd love to add a Cobra and I guess there's no competition currently. Been looking at the pictures and I'm not convinced, but they don't seem bad. I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Yes for track cars, but on the front wheels, for more grip on corners. Never heard of it on the rear wheels, particularly rear wheels only. Of course I'm not a racing car expert, others on here with more knowledge on racing cars maybe able to shed some light on the subject.Wouldn't you want negative camber on a track car? It's usually at least -2.5 and some guys are running -3.0-4.0
edit: went and googled some and here is a 1:1 with appropriate camber and there are many more like it
1:1 with grandpa wheel offset
There is clearly neg camber on the rear wheel. And yes you run camber on both front and rear, just not as much at the rear, usually about 0.5 less. I think on the model there is the illusion of exaggerated camber cause obviously 1/18 tires don't deform and you see the gap between the table and the outside edge of the tire. But I believe the angle of the wheel face is the same in the 1/1 and 1/18, if not slightly largerYour pictures show cars with neutral camber, that is not what I pointed out on the Kyosho models.
Maybe clear to you, but not clear to me from that angle. And nowhere near as bad as on these Kyosho models.There is clearly neg camber on the rear wheel. And yes you run camber on both front and rear, just not as much at the rear, usually about 0.5 less. I think on the model there is the illusion of exaggerated camber cause obviously 1/18 tires don't deform and you see the gap between the table and the outside edge of the tire. But I believe the angle of the wheel face is the same in the 1/1 and 1/18, if not slightly larger
The consensus among some is that the ancient Shelby model is very accurate.Maybe clear to you, but not clear to me from that angle. And nowhere near as bad as on these Kyosho models.
Anyway, let's just agree to disagree. That is my opinion of these models and the reasons why I will save my money for something else, perhaps even another older release Kyosho Cobra which doesn't look perfect either, but at least closer to the 1:1 than the ones on that catalogue.
I was only asked by @pdc to elaborate on why I disliked these Kyosho Cobras, and that's what I did, so my work here is done.![]()
oh don't get me wrong, I've never owned one and don't care much about them lolMaybe clear to you, but not clear to me from that angle. And nowhere near as bad as on these Kyosho models.
Anyway, let's just agree to disagree. That is my opinion of these models and the reasons why I will save my money for something else, perhaps even another older release Kyosho Cobra which doesn't look perfect either, but at least closer to the 1:1 than the ones on that catalogue.
I was only asked by @pdc to elaborate on why I disliked these Kyosho Cobras, and that's what I did, so my work here is done.![]()
I have this same question, with both my 250 GTO and F40. The newer Kyoshos that I have have about the same amount of detailing as the ones released 10-15 years ago, so I'm expecting more or less the same model.I have the old red non high end F40 mint in box but with rash. I wonder whether I should sell it and get the new one. Does the new one have the same level of details of the old non high end F40 except the improved rear light position?
Yeah, the pegs are disappointing. But here's a chance to get one at a reasonable price. I think AA would be great, but I don't even see it on their upcoming list so who knows when that'll happen.Looking for an Aa now/waiting for them to release a revised version. I love the aggressive stance and the detailed engine, but I'm not a fan of pegs in the fog lights, fitment of the lights or the (very 1980s Italian xD) fitment of the doors.
i am afraid not. However I suppose they could if they wish to since they already made the fully opening 308/328 series.. a missed opportunity sadly cos I reckon those will sell very well. I guess I could say the same about their 550 GTC as well. They really should made the road going 550 Maranello alongside with the race car no doubt they will be heaps better than UT and HWE me think.Did Kyosho produce a Ferrari 288GTO at any point in the past?
I'm hoping they did, and it that was very good.
Check this out - a black right hand drive version....
If the picture of the models presented on the catalog correspond to the final products, I see significant improvements (for me) on these 250 GTO, at least on two of them.I have this same question, with both my 250 GTO and F40. The newer Kyoshos that I have have about the same amount of detailing as the ones released 10-15 years ago, so I'm expecting more or less the same model.